Every contingent fact has a sufficient reason
Image: Raicem, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Every contingent fact has a sufficient reason
The principle of sufficient reason (PSR) posits that every contingent fact must have a sufficient reason. This principle is often interpreted as implying that everything has a cause, especially within deterministic systems. However, necessary truths are not considered to require a cause due to their inherent necessity.
Example
If a tree falls in a forest, the PSR suggests there must be a sufficient reason for its falling, such as wind or disease.
Remember this
Understanding PSR helps us explore the underlying reasons behind events and phenomena, enhancing our comprehension of causality and necessity.
Text adapted from Wikipedia, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Logical positivism
Logical positivism's verification principle claims only empirically verifiable statements are meaningful
logical positivism collapsed
Can a philosophy prove itself scientifically?
Is–ought problem
Hume's guillotine: ethical conclusions can't follow from facts alone
A priori and a posteriori
Can you know something is true without ever seeing it?
David Hume
Can reason alone push us to act?
Cosmological argument
Universe's existence requires a First Cause
Swipe through 100 ML concepts daily
Open Pocket Polymath