Can you name water without knowing its chemical formula?
Image: Copy of Lysippos (?), Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Can you name water without knowing its chemical formula?
Imagine you're thirsty and grab a glass of water without knowing anything about its chemical composition. You just know it's what you need to drink.
Kripke's idea is that knowing 'water is H₂O' is like knowing the recipe for water without needing to taste it every time. The term here is "necessary a posteriori."
Example
You know that water is H₂O without having to test every drop.
Remember this
Knowing 'water is H₂O' is both essential and learned through experience, not just intuition.
Text adapted from Wikipedia, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
A priori and a posteriori
Can you know something is true without ever seeing it?
Nominalism
Nominalism claims only particular things exist, universals are just names
Principle of sufficient reason
Every contingent fact has a sufficient reason
Problem of universals
Universals question independent existence
Rigid designator
Kripke's rigid designators refer to the same thing in all possible worlds
Logical positivism
Logical positivism's verification principle claims only empirically verifiable statements are meaningful
Swipe through 100 ML concepts daily
Open Pocket Polymath