Why not choose the simplest explanation when faced with multiple theories?
Occam's razor
Why not choose the simplest explanation when faced with multiple theories?
Imagine you're trying to figure out why your car won't start. There are several possible reasons: the battery is dead, the starter motor is broken, or the fuel pump isn't working.
In this situation, Occam's Razor suggests you should first check the simplest explanation, like whether the battery is dead, before moving on to more complex possibilities.
Example
You check the battery, and it's dead. No need to dive into complex theories about starter motors or fuel pumps.
Remember this
Choose the simplest explanation first; it's called Occam's Razor.
Text adapted from Wikipedia, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Related concepts
Underdetermination
Evidence may support multiple theories
Falsifiability
Popper introduced falsifiability as a criterion for scientific theories
Principle of sufficient reason
Every contingent fact has a sufficient reason
Logical positivism
Logical positivism's verification principle claims only empirically verifiable statements are meaningful
Communicative rationality
Communicative rationality aims for mutual understanding, not domination
logical positivism collapsed
Logical positivism collapsed because its verification principle couldn't verify itself, undermining its own foundation
Swipe through 100 ML concepts daily
Open Pocket Polymath