Can science always be trusted to give us the truth?
Image: Marianne Loir, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Can science always be trusted to give us the truth?
Imagine you're trying to bake a cake, but the recipe says to add a pinch of salt instead of sugar. You follow the recipe blindly, expecting a sweet treat.
This scenario shows that blindly following instructions (a scientific method) without questioning can lead to unexpected results. The punchline is that there's no single scientific method that guarantees truth.
Example
You add salt instead of sugar, and the cake tastes awful.
Remember this
Just because an instruction says so doesn't mean it's correct; questioning and critical thinking are essential.
Text adapted from Wikipedia, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
logical positivism collapsed
Can a philosophy prove itself scientifically?
Scientific realism
Scientific realism posits unobservable entities have the same ontological status as observables
Logical positivism
Logical positivism's verification principle claims only empirically verifiable statements are meaningful
Concept
Can we ever fully express complex ideas with words?
Instrumentalism
Instrumentalism views scientific theories as useful tools, not as descriptions of unobservable reality
The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology
Did science lose touch with life's meaning?
Swipe through 100 ML concepts daily
Open Pocket Polymath