Can you truly know something if luck plays a role in your belief?
Can you truly know something if luck plays a role in your belief?
Imagine you're at a party and someone claims they met a famous celebrity. You believe them because they seem confident, but later find out it was a coincidence. You thought you knew, but luck influenced your belief.
This scenario shows that just believing something because it feels right doesn't guarantee knowledge. Knowledge requires more than just a lucky guess; there's a deeper connection needed.
Example
You believe you met a celebrity (true belief) because of someone's confident story (luck), not because you have solid evidence (justification).
Remember this
Epistemic luck challenges the idea that true belief alone constitutes knowledge; it highlights the necessity of justification beyond mere confidence.
Text adapted from Wikipedia, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Gettier problem
Can we truly know something if luck plays a role in the truth we believe?
Moral responsibility
Moral luck challenges moral responsibility
A priori and a posteriori
Can you know something is true without ever seeing it?
Episteme
Episteme is the Ancient Greek term for 'knowledge' or 'understanding'
Michel Foucault
Foucault's theories link power, knowledge, and social control
Scientific realism
Scientific realism posits unobservable entities have the same ontological status as observables
Swipe through 100 ML concepts daily
Open Pocket Polymath